Friday, November 28, 2025
Wednesday, February 8, 2023
Monday, May 5, 2008
Thursday, May 1, 2008
Sorting Students is GOOD
Tracking students into high and low tracks, and having high standards for college admission are anathema to liberals.
I am liberal on a number of issues, but among my strongest-held beliefs is that the costs of not-sorting students are far greater than the costs of sorting. For example, mixing high- and low-ability kids in the same class virtually ensures that both groups often receive inappropriate-level instruction and an exhausted teacher. Metaevaluations of ability-grouping studies bear this out.
And, yes, it should be done early. The longer we wait, the greater the costs. Of course, I'm not just talking about dollar costs. I'm talking about the costs to both low- and high-achieving kids, to teachers, and importantly, to the larger society.


